This article is from a FAQ concerning SCO operating systems. While some of the information may be applicable to any OS, or any Unix or Linux OS, it may be specific to SCO Xenix, Open Desktop or Openserver.

There is lots of Linux, Mac OS X and general Unix info elsewhere on this site: Search this site is the best way to find anything.

Serial Communications and UUCP

My data-compressing modem doesn't work much faster than my old modem

There are a couple of possible reasons for this. Firstly, you may be transferring data that has already been compressed and is therefore not compressible (compressed news batches, for example). If your modem connects to the remote site using V.42bis data compression, this will not adversely affect throughput. If, however, you are using an MNP level 5 connection, you will actually lose throughput when sending compressed data. If the majority of your transfers are already compressed, you should disable MNP level 5 data compression. Note that using MNP level 3 or 4 error correction, or V.42 error correction, without any compression will increase throughput regardless of the type of data being transmitted.


Hate these ads?

Also, due to the way data compression and error correction in modems work, there are delays involved while the two modems agree on whether or not each packet of data was received correctly. If possible, you and the remote site should try to increase uucico's window size; this will cause more data to be transmitted at once, which will not only improve the efficiency of your modem's data compression, but will also often mean that the response to a previous packet arrives before the window has expired. I'm afraid a complete discussion of packetization and sliding window protocols is beyond the scope of this FAQ; just trust me on this one if you don't quite follow me. Further discussion can sometimes be found in the newsgroup comp.mail.uucp.



cartoon
Need eyes on the ground at your customer's site?
Installation and light training Boston and New England
Reliable and experienced, punctual and professional.


Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
11442661 1,382

/SCOFAQ/FAQ_scotec5compression.html copyright 1997-2003 (various) All Rights Reserved

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

More:
       - FAQ




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://bcstechnology.net Full service Linux & UNIX systems integrator; Windows to UNIX/Linux Client-Server Specialist; Secure E-Mail & Website Hosting; Thoroughbred Software Developer; Custom Industrial Automation; Hardware & Electronics Experts; In Business Since 1985.


http://www.cleverminds.net Need expert advice? Want a second opinion? CleverMinds is a one-stop-shop for a wide range of technology solutions. We support Unix, Linux, SCO as well as CMS, ecom, blogs, podcasts, search engines consulting and more. Contact us at web2.0@cleverminds.net 0r (617) 894-1282


larryi@ccamedical.com SCO OS5, Debian Linux, RedHat Linux, MySQL, Apache, AJAX development using dXport/dL4/Unibasic, Windows Connectivity, Sharing Resouces, Automation, Shell Scripting



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts