Mozilla Firebird


More Articles

Mozilla's new Firebird browser is available for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X. I downloaded and installed both the Mac OS X and Windows versions. At this time ( August 2003) this is still at a pre-release version 0.6.1, but in my testing, there's no reason not to use it as your default browser now. The release notes do warn that the Mac OS X version is still quite rough, but I really didn't notice that to be the case at all.


Hate these ads?

You might also download Thunderbird, which is the companion mail and newsreader. I'll save Thunderbird for a separate review.

Firebird includes a nicely done popup blocker, tabbed browsing, and the typical things you expect from any browser like bookmark management, etc. The major emphasis of Firebird is speed and simplicity, but there is also a large list of extensions that can be added for additional features.

Some of the things that I dislike about Safari on Mac OS X are more to my liking in Firebird. XML documents such as rss feeds are displayed in the same manner as Internet Explorer would show them, and FTP sites are shown within the browser (as opposed to Safari's annoying hand-off to Finder). However, Mozilla Firebird (either platform) fails miserably when presented with a large XML page like http://www.weblogs.com/changes.xml. It may eventually load, but I doubt you'll have the patience to wait for it. Internet Explorer (even the older Mac version) handles that easily. Keep in mind that this is a pre-release version; minor flaws like this will be fixed soon, I'm sure.

There's a web site I know that rather stupidly loads a movie as its first page. Firebird handled that quickly and without complaint, so its problems with large XML probably aren't related to memory handling.

I added the RSS panel extension to both the Mac and Windows versions. It was quite pleasant not to see "Windows version only" warnings at the extension site, and the RSS reader performed identically on both platforms.

The Mac Preferences and windows Options panels look identical. Advanced configuration options can be controlled by typing "about:config" in the browser.






The Search box can be changed with a click to search this page, dmoz.org, or Google. You can even add other choices to it from http://mycroft.mozdev.org/. The regular location bar does a Google "I'm feeling lucky" search on whatever you type in that isn't a web page. Type in "SCO Unix support" and you'll probably land here at aplawrence.com.

The Location bar has other tricks too: type "dict " or "webster " followed by any word you want to look up in a dictionary. You can even add your own keywords: http://www.mozillanews.org/index.php3?article=55. Any bookmark can have a keyword that calls it up, optionally passing the word to the link. Just right click (Mac control click) on any bookmark in the Sidebar and choose properties.

I happened to notice something new to me about Mozilla browsers when saving a web page. Usually browsers just save whatever the web page has in it. So if the IMG SRC= points to a relative link, then when the page is on your computer your browser will look for the image relative to where the file is. But if it is an absolute: http://www.wherever.com/image.gif, then it will look to there and in all probabilty the image will display.

But Mozilla does it differently. Mozilla Firebird and other Mozilla browsers will create a directory for images and will change references in the saved file to point there. If your page is saved as ~/fred, Mozilla creates ~/fred_files. It's more than just images, too: if the page has javascript, it puts functions in there too. In other words, it really goes out of its way to save the whole darn kit and kaboodle. Of course it offers you options to only save the html if that's your desire.

If Firebird is this good now, imagine how nice it will be when finished. Give it a try, I think you'll like it.



Comments


Tue Jul 26 13:31:26 2005: Subject: FireFOX   NorCan
I believe what you're talking about here is fireFOX, not fireBIRD. Firebird is a database, fireFOX is the browser.



Tue Jul 26 13:55:23 2005: Subject:   TonyLawrence
When this article was written, what is now Firefox was called Firebird.



Leaving it as is helps show the age of the article - always important when you are making decisions based on web content.

Add your comments

ad

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
122691,019 8,437

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:
       - MacOSX
       - Reviews
       - Web/HTML
       - Windows




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://www.breakthru.com.au SCO (Openserver and Unixware), Unix, Solaris and Linux Consulting services including: Secure Networking Solutions; Linux based Firewalls; Backup Solutions; Secure Home to Office Network Setup; Phone, Remote and On-Site Support available - Satisfaction Guaranteed!


http://www.schewanick.com SCO Unix, Solaris, Linx (various), PHP, MySQL, Apache, uniBasic, dL4, Perl, System Administration and more....


UBB Computer Services Support for Openserver, Unixware and Linux. Windows integration with Unix/Linux servers. Hardware, Backup and Networking issues. Located near Sacramento CA, we provide onsite support throughout Northern CA and Nationwide via remote access. We are a SCO Authorized Partner and a Microlite BackupEdge Certified Reseller.



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts